Are the steps for performing a natural language search the same for both statutory law and case law?

The correct choice highlights that the steps for performing a natural language search are fundamentally similar for both statutory law and case law. This similarity arises from the fact that natural language searching typically involves entering search terms in everyday language, which both types of legal texts can accommodate. When conducting a search, one generally seeks relevant legal provisions, principles, or precedents regardless of whether they stem from statutes or judicial opinions.

In practice, the process often includes identifying key terms, using relevant phrases, and potentially applying Boolean operators for more precise results. The underlying skills and techniques employed in natural language searching—such as understanding context and relevance—remain consistent across both statutory and case law.

Contextually, the choices that suggest variability—such as claiming differing processes or that it depends on jurisdiction—do not accurately reflect the nature of natural language search methodologies, which are structured to be universally applicable to various legal texts for effective results. Similarly, suggesting that only case law requires different steps implies a misunderstanding of how statutory texts can also be navigated through similar natural language searching techniques.